<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Categorytheory on Patrick Stevens</title><link>/categories/categorytheory/</link><description>Recent content in Categorytheory on Patrick Stevens</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2021 22:47:44 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/categories/categorytheory/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Representable functors</title><link>/posts/2016-01-26-representable-functors/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/posts/2016-01-26-representable-functors/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a post to draw attention to &lt;a href="/misc/RepresentableFunctors/RepresentableFunctors.pdf"&gt;my new article&lt;/a&gt; about representable functors and their links to adjoint functors.
It&amp;rsquo;s very short, but it gives a reason for being interested in representable functors: they are basically &amp;ldquo;those with left adjoints&amp;rdquo;, up to minor quibbles.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Monadicity Theorems</title><link>/posts/2015-12-31-monadicity-theorems/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/posts/2015-12-31-monadicity-theorems/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Another short post to highlight the existence of &lt;a href="/misc/MonadicityTheorems/MonadicityTheorems.pdf"&gt;an article about the Monadicity Theorems&lt;/a&gt;, in which I prove one direction of both the Crude and Precise versions. Comments and corrections would be very much appreciated, because there is an awful lot of work involved in proving those theorems. It would be good to know of any parts where the argument is unclear, unmotivated, too long-winded, or wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>General Adjoint Functor Theorem</title><link>/posts/2015-12-24-general-adjoint-functor-theorem/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/posts/2015-12-24-general-adjoint-functor-theorem/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a post to draw attention to &lt;a href="/misc/AdjointFunctorTheorems/AdjointFunctorTheorems.pdf"&gt;my new article&lt;/a&gt; about the &lt;a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/adjoint&amp;#43;functor&amp;#43;theorem"&gt;General Adjoint Functor Theorem&lt;/a&gt;.
It&amp;rsquo;s a motivation of the GAFT and its proof.
I&amp;rsquo;ve never seen it motivated in this way, and it&amp;rsquo;s actually quite a natural theorem.
I haven&amp;rsquo;t managed to motivate the Special Adjoint Functor Theorem at all, although I&amp;rsquo;m told that it&amp;rsquo;s natural if you know Stone-Cech compactification.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>